Gallant & Gallant

P.O. Box 22425 Santa Barbara, CA 93121 Home Office: 805-962-5729 General Email: [email protected]

Visit site

Testimonials

I have referred many clients to Robin Masson over the years. She is very skilled as a mediator and brings an impressive amount of experience, insight, and dedication to her work. She is sensitive to the needs of each set of mediation clients and tailors each mediation to allow for maximum progress. Her completed agreements are well written and easy for clients to understand. Robin is a mediator you can count on to provide an organized and respectful atmosphere for working through conflict.
Erin E. McKinley, Esq.
Lawyer & Mediator

Blog

Negotiate in Mediation for What You Need -- And Get It.

Negotiate in Mediation for What You Need -- And Get It.
By Robin Masson on Jul 22, 2017 in Divorce Mediation

Face it: most of us are not very good at asking others for what we need. We tend to come off as either too aggressive or wishy-washy. Moreover, when we’re in conflict, our asking skills tend to deteriorate into either demanding bitchiness or passive-aggressiveness that descends into resentment. Not a good look, on anyone.

But, there’s a way to ask for what you need and to enlist others in giving it to you, by being respectfully assertive. It requires communicating clearly what your needs are, how others’ behavior affects you, and enlists others in satisfying your needs.

Read more...

Cohabitation Mediation - What I Wish I'd Known Before Moving in Together

Cohabitation Mediation - What I Wish I'd Known Before Moving in Together
By Robin Masson on Jun 09, 2017 in Cohabitation Mediation

Much less planning goes into cohabitation than into a wedding, but it is, in many ways, a bigger legal, financial and emotional step.

Read more...

Divorce Mediation - The Orange: A Parable About Interest-Based Negotiation

Divorce Mediation - The Orange: A Parable About Interest-Based Negotiation
By Robin Masson on Jun 01, 2017 in Divorce Mediation

Nick and Nora were separating and couldn’t agree upon who should get the orange. Since there was only one orange, it appeared that the “fair” solution (and the one most likely to be imposed if they were in court) would be for them to slice it in half, and each would get half an orange.

Read more...